exit 75 i’m still alive: thedollydamnllama: exit 75 i’m still alive: thedollydamnllama:…
exit 75 i’m still alive: thedollydamnllama: webelieveyou: If you see something and do nothing,…
If you see something and do nothing, you’re not a witness. You’re an accomplice.
Oh man, this!
alright, I…
I actually misunderstood your original post, I think, and for that I am really sorry. I’m also sorry for the snark in my original reply, it was completely unwarranted.
You’re absolutely correct that someone may witness a crime but be unable to step forward. I didn’t write the post, but I knew what she meant and was blind to the other possible interpretations. I’ll talk to the specific contributor who wrote that post and ask for their permission to edit it and add a disclaimer.
Would it be enough to specify that the sentiment is meant only for those who are capable of intervening yet fail to do so, or should there be something else added as well?
No worries—I’m also sorry; my initial response sounds rather abrasive and was primarily driven more by emotion than anything.
I think a specification like that does sound good, and maybe an addition that it’s okay to think about your own safety in those sorts of situations if you’re trying to figure out if you should intervene? On the surface, that can sound like a selfish reason so I’m not sure if that kind of disclaimer would get the blog any sort of negative attention, but it’s still a valid reason. There’s a reason they tell you to put your own oxygen mask on during a flight emergency before helping someone else, basically.

